Alameda Research Seeks $446 Million Over Alleged ‘Preferential Transfers’ to Voyager Digital
On Monday, Alameda Research Ltd. filed a legal complaint against Voyager Digital LLC and HTC Trading Inc. in the U.S. bankruptcy court. The complaint alleges the defendants received preferential transfers of property from Alameda Research and the plaintiffs are seeking to recover approximately $445.8 million from Voyager and HTC. Legal Battle Erupts Over Crypto Asset Transfers Reportedly Made by Alameda Research
A newly filed complaint in the FTX bankruptcy proceedings shows Alameda Research, the defunct quantitative trading firm created by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), is seeking close to $446 million from bankrupt exchange Voyager Digital and HTC Trading. Lawyers for Alameda claim the company paid off outstanding loans after Voyager filed for bankruptcy protection in July. The complaint also claims the transfers are recoverable as an administrative priority under sections 503 and 507 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
“The collapse of Alameda and its affiliates amid allegations that Alameda was secretly borrowing billions of FTX-exchange assets is widely known,” the filing details. “Largely lost in the (justified) attention paid to the alleged misconduct of Alameda and its now-indicted former leadership has been the role played by Voyager and other cryptocurrency ‘lenders’ who funded Alameda and fueled that alleged misconduct, either knowingly or recklessly,” the complaint adds.
When Voyager filed for bankruptcy protection in July, it cited a loan default worth hundreds of millions from Three Arrows Capital. After Voyager’s bankruptcy, Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX claimed they could offer early liquidity to Voyager Digital’s customers in the proceedings. Then they detailed plans to purchase Voyager and its assets for $1.4 billion. Soon after, the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) objected to FTX’s bid, stating the state securities commissioner needed to “determine whether FTX US is complying with the law.”
Alameda’s lawyers say in the filing that after the firm paid Voyager in crypto assets, it “had been unable to determine whether [Voyager] held a valid and effective lien or security interest.” The plaintiffs’ lawyers consider the transfers “preferential transfers” that were “avoidable.” Alameda insists it’s entitled to payment for the transfers, which it says were “made to or for the benefit of one or more of the defendants.” Tags in this story $1.4 billion, Alameda Research, approximately $445.8 million, Assets, avoidable, bankruptcy protection, benefit, bid, Compliance, crypto assets, Customers, defendants, defunct quantitative trading firm, early liquidity, effective lien, Exchange, FTX bankruptcy proceedings, HTC Trading, Law, Lawyers, legal complaint, loan default, outstanding loans, payment, preferential transfers, Proceedings, property, purchase, recover, Sam Bankman-Fried, security interest, state securities commissioner, Texas State Securities Board, Three Arrows Capital, U.S. bankruptcy court, valid, Voyager Digital
What do you think about Alameda Research’s lawsuit against Voyager Digital and HTC Trading? Share your thoughts in the comments section below. Jamie Redman
Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today. Massachusetts-Based Bankprov to End Loan Offerings Secured by Cryptocurrency Mining Rigs NEWS | 4 hours ago FTX Debtors Seek Dismissal of Turkish Entities in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings NEWS | 6 hours ago
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons Previous articleSIMBA Chain Awarded $30M U.S. Air Force STRATFI Next articleVenom Ventures Fund Commits a $5 Million Strategic Investment in the Everscale Blockchain Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Read disclaimerShow comments More Popular NewsIn Case You Missed ItNFT Sales Volume Saw a Small Uptick This Week — Moonbirds, Mutant Apes Take Top Sales
Non-fungible token (NFT) sales saw a small uptick over the last week as $658.4 million in NFT sales were recorded, up 3.35% in seven days. Out of 15 blockchains, Polygon-based NFT sales saw the largest increase in volume, jumping 106.68% ... read more.UAE Airliner Emirates to Launch NFTs and Experiences in the Metaverse Australia to List Bitcoin ETF After 4 Clearinghouse Participants Commit to Meet Stringent Margin Terms Fed"s Bullard Wants to Raise Bank Rate to 3.5% by Year"s End, Hints at 75 Basis Point Rate Hike Interest in Real Estate Investments in Spain Grew 400%, With Some Using Crypto and Stocks as Payment Method